90d vs previous 90d+126 ↑
CELL Player Intelligence
Toek213
Role: junior_officer · Joined: 2019-10-27 · Last battle: 2026-10-16 15:34
Toek213: 90 of 90 days recorded (2026-07-22 – 2026-10-19).
Battles58,602Lifetime
90d vs previous 90d+155 ↑
90d vs previous 90d+3.8 pp ↑
90d vs previous 90d-64 ↓
Trees090d tree crimes
Lifetime WN8 covers 99.64% of tracked tank battles. About missing ratings ↗
Compare with the previous 90 daysSee what changed over equal calendar windows
Current: 90 of 90 days recorded (2026-07-22 – 2026-10-19).
Previous: 85 of 90 days recorded (2026-04-28 – 2026-07-21). Partial history; totals cover recorded days only. Today is still in progress.
| Metric | Current2026-07-22 – 2026-10-19 | Previous2026-04-23 – 2026-07-21 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battles | 291 | 136 | +155 |
| WN8 | 2,158 | 2,032 | +126 |
| Win rate | 50.17% | 46.32% | +3.85 pp |
| Avg damage | 2,050 | 2,114 | -64 |
Player insightsStrengths, watchlist, seven-day movement and badges
Profile type · just for funBase Goblin
Suspiciously interested in circles and reset points.
7-Day Swing
Current 7 days compared with the previous 7 days.
WN8
-43
1,922 now
Win Rate
+10.7 pp
50.00% now
Avg Damage
-676
1,956 now
Insight Badges
Small labels based on recent behaviour. Deep science? No. Useful? Usually.
Winrate Merchant+10.7 pp 7d vs previous 7d
Base Goblin389 cap/reset points in 90d
Cleaner1.21 frags/battle in 90d
More performance contextAverage tier, activity pace and custom indices
Average Tier8.87Weighted by 90d tank battles
Battles / Day3.23Per recorded day in selected period
Damage Ratio1.59Lifetime dealt / received
Carry Index61.9/100WN8, WR, damage, survival
Trend Deck
Daily performance over the last 90 UTC calendar days. Lines connect recorded results across days without data.
WN8 Form
Daily WN8 based on that day’s activity.
Win Rate
Daily win rate from tracked activity.
Average Damage
Average damage per battle by day.
Activity + WTR
Battles per day, with WTR snapshot trend when available.
Tank highlights & playing styleBest and most-used tanks, combat shape and class distribution
Tank Snapshot
Best, roughest, and most-used tanks based on data already in the database.
Best WN8 Tank
T37
T37
Needs Therapy
L.Tr.
L.Tr.
90d Comfort Pick
Ares 85
Ares 85Performance Profile
A compact read on how this player behaves over the recent tracking window.
90-Day Combat Shape
90d Class Distribution
Where the battles are actually going.
Daily battle logA closer look at each tracked day
Recent Daily Activity
Latest tracked day-by-day output.
| Date | Battles | WN8 | Win Rate | Avg Damage | Frags | Spotted | Trees |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-18 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-17 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-16 | 5 | 40.00% | 2,105 | 5 | 4 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-15 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-14 | 13 | 53.85% | 1,899 | 15 | 18 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-13 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-12 | 11 | 45.45% | 2,561 | 9 | 17 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-11 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-10 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-09 | 7 | 42.86% | 2,500 | 3 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-08 | 5 | 40.00% | 3,310 | 10 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-07 | 5 | 20.00% | 2,296 | 7 | 3 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-06 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-05 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-04 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-03 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-02 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-10-01 | 6 | 33.33% | 2,082 | 7 | 6 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-30 | 9 | 44.44% | 1,906 | 19 | 3 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-29 | 7 | 42.86% | 1,845 | 12 | 3 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-28 | 4 | 75.00% | 1,928 | 6 | 6 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-27 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-26 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-25 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-24 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-23 | 8 | 37.50% | 2,498 | 7 | 5 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-22 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-21 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-20 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-19 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-18 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-17 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-16 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-15 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-14 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-13 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-12 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-11 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-10 | 7 | 71.43% | 2,905 | 16 | 5 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-09 | 12 | 83.33% | 2,542 | 20 | 15 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-08 | 5 | 40.00% | 2,530 | 4 | 3 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-07 | 6 | 33.33% | 1,243 | 2 | 10 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-06 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-05 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-04 | 10 | 60.00% | 2,688 | 17 | 6 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-03 | 5 | 60.00% | 3,107 | 10 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-02 | 14 | 42.86% | 2,150 | 10 | 6 | 0 | |
| 2026-09-01 | 8 | 87.50% | 2,346 | 12 | 9 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-31 | 10 | 50.00% | 1,955 | 3 | 5 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-30 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-29 | 15 | 53.33% | 1,741 | 18 | 14 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-28 | 8 | 37.50% | 1,950 | 9 | 6 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-27 | 5 | 60.00% | 1,967 | 12 | 5 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-26 | 12 | 41.67% | 1,996 | 20 | 11 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-25 | 10 | 50.00% | 2,083 | 7 | 8 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-24 | 7 | 57.14% | 1,969 | 8 | 3 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-23 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-22 | 7 | 42.86% | 2,128 | 12 | 6 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-21 | 1 | 0.00% | 2,172 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-20 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-19 | 9 | 66.67% | 1,998 | 7 | 8 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-18 | 15 | 53.33% | 1,671 | 12 | 10 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-17 | 4 | 50.00% | 1,219 | 4 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-16 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-15 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-14 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-13 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-12 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-11 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-10 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-09 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-08 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-07 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-06 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-05 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-04 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-03 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-02 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-01 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-07-31 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-07-30 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-07-29 | 4 | 25.00% | 2,224 | 7 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2026-07-28 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-07-27 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-07-26 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-07-25 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-07-24 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-07-23 | 19 | 52.63% | 1,660 | 20 | 18 | 0 | |
| 2026-07-22 | 18 | 38.89% | 1,114 | 19 | 8 | 0 |
Tank Performance
Find your strongest tanks within the same tier and class. Recent results are compared with your lifetime record.
Recent rankings default to 20 battles. Choose “All samples” to see every tank. Select “Same tier & class” to narrow the comparison. Lifetime includes the recent period.
| Tank | Tier | Class | Battles | WN8 | Lifetime WN8 | WN8 change vs lifetime | Win rate | Avg damage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WZ-113G FT | 10 | Tank destroyer | 1 Small sample | 2,165 | +1,382 | 100.00% | 4,141 | |
| Tiger I | 7 | Heavy tank | 43 20+ battles | 2,438 | +729 | 51.16% | 2,016 | |
| Grille 15 | 10 | Tank destroyer | 1 Small sample | 2,484 | +526 | 0.00% | 5,183 | |
| WZ-120-1 FT | 8 | Tank destroyer | 1 Small sample | 2,902 | +96 | 100.00% | 3,161 | |
| EBR 105 | 10 | Light tank | 1 Small sample | 2,062 | +910 | 100.00% | 2,864 | |
| M-V-Y | 10 | Heavy tank | 13 Small sample | 2,694 | +63 | 76.92% | 2,843 | |
| Pz. 55 | 8 | Heavy tank | 24 20+ battles | 2,310 | +167 | 41.67% | 2,329 | |
| Sheridan | 10 | Light tank | 5 Small sample | 2,382 | -62 | 60.00% | 2,005 | |
| Progetto 65 | 10 | Medium tank | 10 Small sample | 3,329 | -1,095 | 30.00% | 2,803 | |
| 50TP pr. | 8 | Heavy tank | 1 Small sample | 2,227 | +3 | 0.00% | 1,939 | |
| Vz. 55 | 10 | Heavy tank | 10 Small sample | 2,220 | -48 | 70.00% | 2,422 | |
| CS-52 LIS | 8 | Medium tank | 1 Small sample | 2,293 | -182 | 100.00% | 1,626 | |
| Type 71 | 10 | Heavy tank | 2 Small sample | 1,676 | +320 | 100.00% | 2,448 | |
| Imbattable | 11 | Heavy tank | 7 Small sample | 2,246 | -255 | 71.43% | 2,804 | |
| T110E5 | 10 | Heavy tank | 25 20+ battles | 2,604 | -672 | 52.00% | 2,342 | |
| SU-130PM | 8 | Tank destroyer | 6 Small sample | 2,477 | -574 | 83.33% | 1,625 | |
| Pz. 58 Mutz | 8 | Medium tank | 7 Small sample | 2,480 | -579 | 28.57% | 1,455 | |
| 212A | 9 | Artillery | 2 Small sample | 1,103 | +794 | 0.00% | 2,118 | |
| Ares 85 | 9 | Medium tank | 52 20+ battles | 1,835 | +8 | 42.31% | 1,848 | |
| Badger | 10 | Tank destroyer | 2 Small sample | 2,429 | -669 | 0.00% | 2,536 | |
| M48 Patton | 10 | Medium tank | 6 Small sample | 2,855 | -1,099 | 50.00% | 2,206 | |
| Ho-Ri 3 | 10 | Tank destroyer | 6 Small sample | 1,955 | -292 | 50.00% | 2,307 | |
| AMX 13 105 | 10 | Light tank | 2 Small sample | 2,998 | -1,464 | 50.00% | 1,301 | |
| 122 TM | 8 | Medium tank | 5 Small sample | 2,632 | -1,121 | 60.00% | 1,264 | |
| AMX M4 54 | 10 | Heavy tank | 2 Small sample | 2,793 | -1,336 | 100.00% | 2,100 | |
| Lorr. 40 t | 8 | Medium tank | 20 20+ battles | 2,278 | -822 | 40.00% | 1,268 | |
| Progetto 46 | 8 | Medium tank | 2 Small sample | 3,339 | -1,963 | 100.00% | 1,186 | |
| BZ-79 | 11 | Heavy tank | 7 Small sample | 1,642 | -281 | 57.14% | 2,525 | |
| Foch B | 10 | Tank destroyer | 4 Small sample | 1,347 | -23 | 50.00% | 1,831 | |
| T-34-3 | 8 | Medium tank | 6 Small sample | 2,586 | -1,367 | 50.00% | 1,151 | |
| AMX 13 90 | 9 | Light tank | 1 Small sample | 2,798 | -1,778 | 0.00% | 988 | |
| Somua SM | 8 | Heavy tank | 2 Small sample | 2,097 | -1,079 | 50.00% | 1,194 | |
| Obj. 261 | 10 | Artillery | 4 Small sample | 1,005 | -119 | 25.00% | 1,280 | |
| Canopener | 10 | Heavy tank | 1 Small sample | 2,075 | -1,594 | 100.00% | 803 |
Toek213: Cruising in Style, but Time to Kick It Up a Gear?
Toek213’s recent seven-day stint might feel like cruise control: eighteen games with a dead-even winrate and solid, if slightly dipped, WN8 and average damage compared to their 30-day run. While the overall 30-day showing is decent with respectable consistency and versatile play, most recent battles have swapped out longtime favorites for some new metal, prioritizing performance over nostalgia. The lower survival rate suggests an aggressive style that hasn’t paid off recent dividends—perhaps a sign it’s time for a tactical rethink to shake this winrate slump.
Explore player insights →